"This is about quality of life, a way of life we need to protect and improve."
Alternative Site Possibilities
Get the latest Flash Player to see this player.
I believe the location of the proposed hydroelectric project on the north side of the spillway, (its current proposed location) is just fine.
I'm very concerned about how the proposed project's (current) location will affect the wildlife that live in this area.
I'm very concerned about the removal of existing vegetation to make room for the proposed project.
I'm very concerned about the removal of the existing vegetation to make 'room', (also known as 'staging areas'), for the construction activity required by this proposed project.
I think the information presented by Mr. Steele is not really useful in understanding the issue about the project's location.
I think the alternative site proposed by Mr. Steele on the south side of the spillway is a better location.
If this project moves forward, we should require the project to be located on the south side of the spillway.
Email Address (will not be published) (required)
Mailing Address (optional)